Triple
T9321830
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sindelfingen |
E224283
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTwinTown |
P919
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Győr |
E332893
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Győr | Statement: [Sindelfingen, hasTwinTown, Győr]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Győr Context triple: [Sindelfingen, hasTwinTown, Győr]
-
A.
Győr
chosen
Győr is a historic city in northwestern Hungary, known as an important regional cultural and economic center at the confluence of the Danube, Rába, and Rábca rivers.
-
B.
Kaposvár
Kaposvár is a city in southwestern Hungary that serves as the administrative and cultural center of Somogy County.
-
C.
Veszprém
Veszprém is a historic city in western Hungary known for its medieval castle district and role as a regional cultural and administrative center.
-
D.
Gödöllő
Gödöllő is a Hungarian town near Budapest best known for its historic Royal Palace, one of the largest Baroque palaces in Hungary.
-
E.
Zalaegerszeg
Zalaegerszeg is a city in western Hungary that serves as the administrative center of Zala County and a regional economic and cultural hub.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8426d48481909596360f7791c7dd |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd36f2bd288190bb1556a88d9e90f3 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:17 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d19f55c9c881909a315d10cea10834 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 11:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:38 p.m.