Triple

T9320269
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Owings, Maryland E224234 entity
Predicate suburbanRuralCharacter P9847 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Owings, Maryland, suburbanRuralCharacter, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: suburbanRuralCharacter
Context triple: [Owings, Maryland, suburbanRuralCharacter, true]
  • A. semiRuralCharacter
    Indicates that a place or area has characteristics intermediate between rural and urban, combining elements of both environments.
  • B. hasSuburbanCharacter chosen
    Indicates that something possesses qualities or features typically associated with suburban areas, such as lower density, residential focus, and car-oriented development.
  • C. hasRuralZoningCharacter
    Indicates that a property or area possesses zoning attributes and regulations typical of rural land use.
  • D. isPredominantlyRural
    Indicates that a place or region is characterized mainly by rural features, such as low population density and extensive non-urban land use.
  • E. hasRuralLandscapeType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a specific type of rural landscape.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8426d48481909596360f7791c7dd completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd358dcb4c81909e00bfb58a6dda3f completed April 1, 2026, 3:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc7a61e9a4819096eb014f3791ef2e completed April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:38 p.m.