Triple

T9314173
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Criminal Justice Act 1967 E224076 entity
Predicate introducedParoleSystem P88037 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Criminal Justice Act 1967, introducedParoleSystem, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedParoleSystem
Context triple: [Criminal Justice Act 1967, introducedParoleSystem, yes]
  • A. eventuallyParoled
    Indicates that an individual who was previously incarcerated was later released from prison on parole.
  • B. posthumousPardonGrantedBy
    Indicates that a formal pardon was granted to an individual after their death by a specified authority or institution.
  • C. deathSentenceCommutedBy
    Indicates that a previously imposed death sentence on an individual is officially reduced or replaced with a lesser punishment by a specified authority.
  • D. pardonOrClemencyBy
    Indicates that an authority grants a pardon or clemency to someone, forgiving or reducing their legal penalties.
  • E. restrictionAfterPardon
    Indicates that a restriction or limitation is imposed on an entity following the granting of a pardon.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8425f4fc81909c1c586e9a5b7530 completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd20b2274481908ddb4eda70cea8cc completed April 1, 2026, 1:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc7a61e9a4819096eb014f3791ef2e completed April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc955a38108190b602d1e73725f11b completed April 1, 2026, 3:47 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:37 p.m.