Triple
T9313303
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | M-root |
E224056
|
entity |
| Predicate | reliabilityDesign |
P10377
|
FINISHED |
| Object | distributed anycast instances worldwide |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: distributed anycast instances worldwide | Statement: [M-root, reliabilityDesign, distributed anycast instances worldwide]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reliabilityDesign Context triple: [M-root, reliabilityDesign, distributed anycast instances worldwide]
-
A.
reliabilityMechanism
chosen
Indicates a mechanism or process that ensures the dependable, consistent, and correct functioning of a system or relationship.
-
B.
reliabilityRecord
Indicates that there exists a record or documentation capturing the reliability characteristics, performance, or history associated with an entity or relationship.
-
C.
engineReliability
Indicates how consistently and dependably an engine performs its intended function without failure over time.
-
D.
designedForReusability
Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured so it can be used multiple times without needing to be discarded or fundamentally rebuilt.
-
E.
designedWith
Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8425f4fc81909c1c586e9a5b7530 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd20b048a081909fd7ec0b6b863063 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc7a61e9a4819096eb014f3791ef2e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:37 p.m.