Triple

T9312836
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 7720 E224045 entity
Predicate updates P4061 FINISHED
Object RFC 2870 E224046 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 2870 | Statement: [RFC 7720, updates, RFC 2870]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 2870
Context triple: [RFC 7720, updates, RFC 2870]
  • A. RFC 2870 chosen
    RFC 2870 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document that specifies operational and technical requirements for the DNS root name server system.
  • B. RFC 2865
    RFC 2865 is the IETF standard that specifies the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) protocol for centralized authentication, authorization, and accounting in network access.
  • C. RFC 2487
    RFC 2487 is an Internet standards document that originally defined the STARTTLS extension for securing SMTP connections with TLS, later superseded by RFC 3207.
  • D. RFC 1870
    RFC 1870 is an earlier Internet standards document that defined support for extended SMTP message sizes before being superseded by RFC 2821.
  • E. RFC 2866
    RFC 2866 is an IETF specification that defines the accounting extensions for the RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service) protocol used in network access and usage tracking.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8425f4fc81909c1c586e9a5b7530 completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd20ae96e481909a1af9ea1c91f2b2 completed April 1, 2026, 1:42 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d0c797640c8190be003e321faf3b86 completed April 4, 2026, 8:11 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:37 p.m.