Triple
T931198
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Regulation Z |
E20095
|
entity |
| Predicate | formerLegalCitation |
P21534
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 12 CFR Part 226 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 12 CFR Part 226 | Statement: [Regulation Z, formerLegalCitation, 12 CFR Part 226]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerLegalCitation Context triple: [Regulation Z, formerLegalCitation, 12 CFR Part 226]
-
A.
legalCitation
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
-
B.
legalCitationType
Indicates the specific kind or category of legal citation that characterizes the relationship between the citing and cited legal sources.
-
C.
usedInLegalCitation
Indicates that one entity is referenced or relied upon as an authoritative source within a legal citation to support legal arguments or decisions.
-
D.
constitutionalCitation
Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
-
E.
legalCitationAbbreviation
Indicates that one legal citation is an abbreviated or shortened form of another legal citation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493af3dc48190adb7263e6e445ea1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b34b302c81908fa32cb18f551493 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b29876348190a29f4ff9878074a5 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b2f4e3fc81908c8a2d1fbef9c5d2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.