Triple
T9309070
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cutter |
E223962
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseConcernedStatute |
P8819
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 |
E6731
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 | Statement: [Cutter, caseConcernedStatute, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 Context triple: [Cutter, caseConcernedStatute, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000]
-
A.
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
chosen
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act is a U.S. federal law that protects individuals, religious institutions, and prisoners from government actions that substantially burden their religious exercise, particularly in land use and institutional settings.
-
B.
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act is a 1993 U.S. federal law that aims to protect individuals’ religious practices from substantial government burdens unless justified by a compelling governmental interest pursued through the least restrictive means.
-
C.
International Religious Freedom Act of 1998
The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 is a U.S. federal law that institutionalizes the promotion and protection of religious freedom worldwide as a core objective of American foreign policy.
-
D.
Ley sobre Libertad de Cultos
La Ley sobre Libertad de Cultos fue una norma mexicana del siglo XIX que garantizó la libertad religiosa y limitó el poder de la Iglesia católica en el marco de las Leyes de Reforma.
-
E.
Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act
The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act is a U.S. federal law that protects access to reproductive health services by prohibiting the use or threat of force, obstruction, or property damage against clinics, providers, and patients.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: caseConcernedStatute Context triple: [Cutter, caseConcernedStatute, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000]
-
A.
statuteInvolved
chosen
Indicates that a particular statute or legal provision is implicated, referenced, or applied in relation to a given case, event, or legal matter.
-
B.
affectsStatute
Indicates that one legal action, decision, or document has a modifying, influencing, or changing impact on a particular statute.
-
C.
hasStatuteLaw
Indicates that a jurisdiction or entity is governed by, or possesses, a body of formal written laws enacted by a legislative authority.
-
D.
legalCaseRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
-
E.
statuteInterpreted
Indicates that a legal authority (such as a court or agency) has provided an interpretation or authoritative reading of a particular statute.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8424d0f08190831e2e93c6533aeb |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd1daba67c819081d53545d67ef127 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d0c784f24481909af5f0daa1b8333a |
completed | April 4, 2026, 8:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc7a61e9a4819096eb014f3791ef2e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:37 p.m.