Triple

T9304231
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Criminal Investigations Division (Texas) E223840 entity
Predicate investigativeScope P87971 FINISHED
Object statewide LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: statewide | Statement: [Criminal Investigations Division (Texas), investigativeScope, statewide]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: investigativeScope
Context triple: [Criminal Investigations Division (Texas), investigativeScope, statewide]
  • A. investigativeFocus
    Indicates that an entity is the primary subject or target of investigation, inquiry, or detailed scrutiny by another entity.
  • B. investigatedFor
    Indicates that an entity is the subject of an investigation concerning a suspected involvement in another entity (typically a crime, incident, or wrongdoing).
  • C. investigatedBy
    Indicates that an entity is the subject of an investigation carried out by another entity.
  • D. investigatedUsing
    Indicates that an investigation, study, or analysis was carried out by means of a specified method, tool, or resource.
  • E. settingOfInvestigation
    Indicates the context, environment, or circumstances in which an investigation takes place.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8424d0f08190831e2e93c6533aeb completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd1da623ac81908bab6dfb1bbce25d completed April 1, 2026, 1:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc7a5ef1908190bc5ca166bb895af6 completed April 1, 2026, 1:52 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc955a38108190b602d1e73725f11b completed April 1, 2026, 3:47 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:36 p.m.