Triple
T929636
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | W3C Technical Reports |
E20060
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesConformanceSection |
P21514
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [W3C Technical Reports, includesConformanceSection, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesConformanceSection Context triple: [W3C Technical Reports, includesConformanceSection, true]
-
A.
hasConformanceRequirements
Indicates that an entity is subject to specific rules, standards, or criteria that it must satisfy or comply with.
-
B.
usesConformanceLevels
Indicates that one entity applies or adheres to defined conformance levels when interacting with or evaluating another entity.
-
C.
includesStandard
Indicates that one entity contains, incorporates, or makes use of a particular standard as part of its definition, implementation, or specification.
-
D.
conformsTo
Indicates that one entity complies with, follows, or is in accordance with a specified standard, specification, rule, or guideline.
-
E.
isCoveredBy
Indicates that one entity is physically or conceptually overlaid, protected, or enclosed by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493af3dc48190adb7263e6e445ea1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b349b3d0819090c58b4fb60c6a1b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b29876348190a29f4ff9878074a5 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b2f4e3fc81908c8a2d1fbef9c5d2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.