Triple
T929112
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William Harvey |
E20050
|
entity |
| Predicate | challengedTheory |
P3648
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Galenic theory of blood ebb and flow |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Galenic theory of blood ebb and flow | Statement: [William Harvey, challengedTheory, Galenic theory of blood ebb and flow]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengedTheory Context triple: [William Harvey, challengedTheory, Galenic theory of blood ebb and flow]
-
A.
challengedConcept
chosen
Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or called into doubt the validity, accuracy, or applicability of a particular concept.
-
B.
supportsTheory
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
-
C.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
D.
challengedStatute
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
-
E.
theorized
Indicates that one entity has proposed or developed a theoretical explanation or hypothesis about another entity or phenomenon.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493af3dc48190adb7263e6e445ea1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b34775ac8190aabbd047a36cec6b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b29876348190a29f4ff9878074a5 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.