Triple

T9255935
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus E222442 entity
Predicate praenomen P7966 FINISHED
Object Gnaeus E222442 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gnaeus | Statement: [Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, praenomen, Gnaeus]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gnaeus
Context triple: [Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, praenomen, Gnaeus]
  • A. Gnaeus chosen
    Gnaeus is the praenomen (given name) of the prominent Roman general and statesman Pompey the Great.
  • B. Gaius
    Gaius was a prominent 2nd-century Roman jurist whose legal writings, especially his Institutes, significantly shaped later Roman and European legal traditions.
  • C. Gaius
    Gaius is the praenomen (personal name) of the Roman lawyer, author, and magistrate known as Pliny the Younger.
  • D. Gaius
    Gaius is a common Roman praenomen (given name) frequently borne by notable figures of the Roman Republic and Empire.
  • E. Gaius
    Gaius is an early Christian believer and church member addressed personally and commended by the Apostle John in the New Testament.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca841e4cd481908e738c74e958eaea completed March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd06b3c314819096632b8263288aae completed April 1, 2026, 11:51 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d2696450e4819086d5aac368127e5f completed April 5, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:32 p.m.