Triple

T9230002
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Christian Buddenbrook E221790 entity
Predicate failsToConformTo P87688 FINISHED
Object bourgeois expectations LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bourgeois expectations | Statement: [Christian Buddenbrook, failsToConformTo, bourgeois expectations]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: failsToConformTo
Context triple: [Christian Buddenbrook, failsToConformTo, bourgeois expectations]
  • A. conformsTo
    Indicates that one entity complies with, follows, or is in accordance with a specified standard, specification, rule, or guideline.
  • B. notEnforcedBy
    Indicates that a rule, policy, or obligation is not upheld, imposed, or carried out by the referenced enforcing entity.
  • C. failedOn
    Indicates that an attempted action or process did not succeed when applied to a specific target, condition, or step.
  • D. failsWhen
    Indicates that a particular action, process, or condition does not succeed under the specified circumstances or triggers.
  • E. consistentWith
    Indicates that one entity does not contradict and is compatible or in agreement with another entity, condition, or set of constraints.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83ed628c8190bc02d641e57f097f completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ccee17a2dc8190b373f78be7247f0d completed April 1, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc7a3daeb481908b0abde3fbc1f1f0 completed April 1, 2026, 1:51 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc95597be081908ece2491dd2f0f74 completed April 1, 2026, 3:47 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:29 p.m.