Triple
T9222014
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Parinacota Province |
E221582
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProtectedAreaCoverage |
P87662
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [Parinacota Province, hasProtectedAreaCoverage, high]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProtectedAreaCoverage Context triple: [Parinacota Province, hasProtectedAreaCoverage, high]
-
A.
hasProtectedArea
Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a designated protected area for conservation or restricted use.
-
B.
hasProtectedAreaStatus
Indicates that an area is officially designated and managed as a protected area under relevant conservation or legal frameworks.
-
C.
hasProtectedAreaAccess
Indicates that an entity is permitted to enter, use, or otherwise access a designated protected area under defined conditions.
-
D.
hasProtectedAreaCategory
Indicates that an area is assigned a specific protection or conservation category under a recognized protected area classification system.
-
E.
hasProtectedAreaAuthority
Indicates that an entity holds official authority or responsibility for managing or overseeing a protected area.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83ec8db08190a9110df8232885d2 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ccda76e3648190af9e24381db7679a |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc7a3daeb481908b0abde3fbc1f1f0 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cc95597be081908ece2491dd2f0f74 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:28 p.m.