Triple

T922179
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject European Systemic Risk Board E19904 entity
Predicate becameOperational P21563 FINISHED
Object 2011 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2011 | Statement: [European Systemic Risk Board, becameOperational, 2011]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: becameOperational
Context triple: [European Systemic Risk Board, becameOperational, 2011]
  • A. fullyOperationalBy
    Indicates that an entity is expected or required to be completely functional and ready for use no later than a specified time or event.
  • B. operatedAs
    Indicates that an entity functioned or was used in the capacity, role, or identity of another entity for some period of time.
  • C. operatedFor
    Indicates that one entity performed operations or provided services on behalf of, or in support of, another entity for a certain period or purpose.
  • D. operatedBefore
    Indicates that one entity performed an operation or action at an earlier time than another entity.
  • E. operatingStatus
    Indicates whether an entity is currently functioning, active, or in service versus inactive, closed, or out of service.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493a099788190a696d9d8408cbaf4 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b313cb908190ad78b3a54e4f2eb7 completed March 1, 2026, 9:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b295b02481908e5f53bfcb83cc94 completed March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b30efd2c8190b780a6dee086d0aa completed March 1, 2026, 9:43 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.