Triple

T9199671
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Münsterländer Bucht E220804 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Coesfeld E205349 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Coesfeld | Statement: [Münsterländer Bucht, contains, Coesfeld]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Coesfeld
Context triple: [Münsterländer Bucht, contains, Coesfeld]
  • A. Coesfeld chosen
    Coesfeld is a town in the Münster region of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, known as a local administrative and commercial center.
  • B. Gescher
    Gescher is a small town in western Germany’s Münsterland region, noted for its traditional bell foundries and rural character.
  • C. Gevelsberg
    Gevelsberg is a town in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, situated in the Ennepe-Ruhr district within the Ruhr metropolitan region.
  • D. Breckerfeld
    Breckerfeld is a small town in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, known for its rural character and location in the hilly, forested region of the Sauerland.
  • E. Fritzlar
    Fritzlar is a historic town in northern Hesse, Germany, known for its well-preserved medieval old town and its significance in early German Christian history.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83e8e9248190862cf3e41693b310 completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ccd881c5d48190bbc33fac71a1d849 completed April 1, 2026, 8:34 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d1cc2ca7a081908f597e9a58920d6e completed April 5, 2026, 2:42 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:25 p.m.