Triple

T9195482
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Long Lake E220694 entity
Predicate isLikelyLocatedIn P28981 FINISHED
Object local recreational area LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local recreational area | Statement: [Long Lake, isLikelyLocatedIn, local recreational area]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isLikelyLocatedIn
Context triple: [Long Lake, isLikelyLocatedIn, local recreational area]
  • A. sometimesLocatedIn
    Indicates that an entity is located in a given place only at certain times or under certain conditions, rather than permanently or always.
  • B. possibleLocation chosen
    Indicates that an entity may be located at, or could plausibly occur in, a specified place or spatial context.
  • C. likelyRegion
    Indicates that an entity is probably located in, associated with, or originates from a particular geographic region.
  • D. isLocatedInAdministrativeArea
    Indicates that one entity is situated within the geographic or jurisdictional boundaries of a specified administrative area (such as a city, county, state, or region).
  • E. locatedIn
    Indicates that one entity exists or is situated within the spatial, administrative, or conceptual boundaries of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83e7ba70819088b74866d9da2c30 completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ccd87c3a3c8190b60f19873ef6e1f8 completed April 1, 2026, 8:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc660af2408190ae06eb8326e1c64e completed April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:25 p.m.