Triple

T919025
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Belmont Warrant Committee E19839 entity
Predicate scopeOfReview P11084 FINISHED
Object annual operating budget LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: annual operating budget | Statement: [Belmont Warrant Committee, scopeOfReview, annual operating budget]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: scopeOfReview
Context triple: [Belmont Warrant Committee, scopeOfReview, annual operating budget]
  • A. oversightScope chosen
    Indicates the range or extent of responsibilities and activities that fall under an entity’s oversight or supervisory authority.
  • B. scopeOfUse
    Indicates the range, context, or conditions under which something is intended, allowed, or applicable to be used.
  • C. coverageScope
    Indicates the extent or range of entities, conditions, or situations that are included under a particular coverage or applicability.
  • D. scopeOfContribution
    Indicates the specific area, domain, or extent within which an entity’s contribution or involvement applies.
  • E. scopeDetail
    Indicates a more specific or refined characterization of the extent, boundaries, or coverage of something within a broader scope.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493a099788190a696d9d8408cbaf4 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b388f0bc8190a087222636135ba5 completed March 1, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b2944ff88190a260be5355132ba5 completed March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.