Triple
T9187237
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hyperion Entertainment |
E220489
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDeveloped |
P86457
|
FINISHED |
| Object | AmigaOS kernel components |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: AmigaOS kernel components | Statement: [Hyperion Entertainment, hasDeveloped, AmigaOS kernel components]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDeveloped Context triple: [Hyperion Entertainment, hasDeveloped, AmigaOS kernel components]
-
A.
hasDevelopmentStatus
Indicates the current stage or condition of progress or completion that something is in.
-
B.
hasDevelopmentType
Indicates the type or category of development associated with an entity, such as the nature, form, or stage of its development.
-
C.
hasDevelopmentSystem
Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with a particular system, platform, or environment used for development activities.
-
D.
developedThrough
Indicates that something came into existence, was created, or was brought to its current form by means of a specified process, method, or developmental pathway.
-
E.
hasDevelopmentActor
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or supported by a specific actor responsible for its development or advancement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e6d77c81909862b7afef56b1bf |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ccc31bd6f88190b2ea644420995e41 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 7:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc66090e5881908889dc1213815626 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:24 p.m.