Triple

T9177213
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Buff Orpington E220230 entity
Predicate wasDevelopedIn P86667 FINISHED
Object late 19th century LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: late 19th century | Statement: [Buff Orpington, wasDevelopedIn, late 19th century]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasDevelopedIn
Context triple: [Buff Orpington, wasDevelopedIn, late 19th century]
  • A. alsoDevelopedIn
    Indicates that something was additionally developed in another context, location, or environment beyond the primary one already specified.
  • B. developedAs
    Indicates that one entity was created, designed, or evolved specifically to function as or replace another entity.
  • C. developedUnder
    Indicates that something was created, produced, or brought into existence while being subject to the authority, guidance, or conditions imposed by a particular person, organization, regime, or framework.
  • D. firstDeveloped
    Indicates that one entity was the earliest to create, originate, or bring another entity into existence.
  • E. developedWith
    Indicates that something was created, built, or produced using a specified tool, technology, method, or collaborator.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83e589948190ac9907819db11ddf completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ccbfa60c3c8190b6335b9067de5b72 completed April 1, 2026, 6:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc660761d88190ab6134b43b376964 completed April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc66d7bf648190b8bff5b584b84975 completed April 1, 2026, 12:29 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:23 p.m.