Triple

T9175251
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject HTTP/1.1 Range Requests E220182 entity
Predicate fallbackWhenIfRangeFails P64399 FINISHED
Object 200 OK with full representation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 200 OK with full representation | Statement: [HTTP/1.1 Range Requests, fallbackWhenIfRangeFails, 200 OK with full representation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fallbackWhenIfRangeFails
Context triple: [HTTP/1.1 Range Requests, fallbackWhenIfRangeFails, 200 OK with full representation]
  • A. fallbackTo chosen
    Indicates that when a primary option, method, or resource is unavailable or fails, an alternative one is used instead.
  • B. failsWhen
    Indicates that a particular action, process, or condition does not succeed under the specified circumstances or triggers.
  • C. hasRange
    Indicates that a property or relation is constrained to take its values from a specified class, type, or value set.
  • D. excludeRange
    Indicates that certain values, items, or elements falling within a specified range are to be omitted or not considered.
  • E. failureBehavior
    Indicates how a system, component, or process is expected to respond or act when a failure or error condition occurs.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83e589948190ac9907819db11ddf completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ccbfa2f9708190a955bf28a4f04004 completed April 1, 2026, 6:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc660761d88190ab6134b43b376964 completed April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:23 p.m.