Triple

T9169825
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gender Inequality Index E220053 entity
Predicate bestValueMeaning P68350 FINISHED
Object 0 indicates no gender inequality LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 0 indicates no gender inequality | Statement: [Gender Inequality Index, bestValueMeaning, 0 indicates no gender inequality]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bestValueMeaning
Context triple: [Gender Inequality Index, bestValueMeaning, 0 indicates no gender inequality]
  • A. logicalMeaning chosen
    Indicates that one entity expresses, encodes, or conveys the logical content, implication, or formal meaning of another.
  • B. bestOf
    Indicates that one entity is the top-ranked or most outstanding member within a specified group, set, or collection.
  • C. commonMeaning
    Indicates that multiple entities share the same or very similar meaning or semantic interpretation.
  • D. valuedBy
    Indicates that one entity is regarded as important, useful, or held in high esteem by another entity.
  • E. holdsBestFor
    Indicates that one entity considers or maintains another entity as the most suitable or optimal choice for a particular purpose or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83e467108190abcae6a33b3d4dad completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ccaae23f048190847f12317be925b1 completed April 1, 2026, 5:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc660761d88190ab6134b43b376964 completed April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:22 p.m.