Triple
T9148468
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Felix Grant |
E219520
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableReason |
P60959
|
FINISHED |
| Object | being a child of Hugh Grant |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: being a child of Hugh Grant | Statement: [Felix Grant, hasNotableReason, being a child of Hugh Grant]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableReason Context triple: [Felix Grant, hasNotableReason, being a child of Hugh Grant]
-
A.
hasNotablePublicityReason
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific reason or event that has led to notable public attention or publicity.
-
B.
hasNotableIssue
Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant problem, concern, or defect that is noteworthy or exceptional compared to typical cases.
-
C.
hasNotableSubject
Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject that is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy in relation to it.
-
D.
hasNotableFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, trait, or attribute that is considered significant or noteworthy.
-
E.
hasNotableClaim
Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant, widely recognized statement, assertion, or claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e121dc81909912bd66953081c5 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cca91a1fd08190a5bb3d9280439b09 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc6603ce8c8190bf6e8d6754bdec54 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:20 p.m.