Triple
T9136537
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Senior Courts of England and Wales |
E219218
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoRegulatedBy |
P68074
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Constitutional Reform Act 2005 |
E17590
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Constitutional Reform Act 2005 | Statement: [Senior Courts of England and Wales, alsoRegulatedBy, Constitutional Reform Act 2005]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Constitutional Reform Act 2005 Context triple: [Senior Courts of England and Wales, alsoRegulatedBy, Constitutional Reform Act 2005]
-
A.
Constitutional Reform Act 2005
chosen
The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 is a major UK statute that restructured the country's judicial and constitutional framework, including creating the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and reforming the role of the Lord Chancellor.
-
B.
Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010
The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 is a UK statute that put key aspects of the civil service and treaty ratification onto a statutory footing, strengthening parliamentary oversight and modernising constitutional arrangements.
-
C.
House of Lords Act 1999
The House of Lords Act 1999 is a UK law that significantly reformed the composition of the House of Lords by removing most hereditary peers, marking a major step in modernizing the British Parliament’s upper chamber.
-
D.
Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 (repealed but historically related)
The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 was a UK constitutional statute that replaced the Prime Minister’s discretion to call general elections with a system of scheduled five-year parliamentary terms and limited mechanisms for early dissolution.
-
E.
Supreme Court Act 2003
The Supreme Court Act 2003 is the New Zealand statute that established the Supreme Court as the country’s highest appellate court, replacing appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alsoRegulatedBy Context triple: [Senior Courts of England and Wales, alsoRegulatedBy, Constitutional Reform Act 2005]
-
A.
hasRegulatedBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity is subject to control, governance, or rules imposed by another entity.
-
B.
alsoRegulates
Indicates that an entity not only has a primary regulatory effect on a target but additionally regulates that same target through another, supplementary regulatory relationship.
-
C.
regulatesOrIsRegulatedBy
Indicates a bidirectional regulatory relationship in which one entity controls, influences, or modulates another, or is itself controlled, influenced, or modulated by that other entity.
-
D.
associatedWithRegulation
Indicates a relationship where something is linked to, governed by, or relevant to a specific regulation or regulatory framework.
-
E.
regulatedIn
Indicates that one entity’s activity, expression, or occurrence is controlled, influenced, or modulated by another entity within a specific context or system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e012288190a5771058adbaabd2 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cca8e1dc208190aafe501374ffe65c |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d05452acb481909fcf5f826caa6ae6 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 11:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc6601d77881908299d58db6e64937 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:18 p.m.