Triple

T9126730
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2010 Myanmar general election E218983 entity
Predicate seatsContestedApprox P11588 FINISHED
Object 1158 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1158 | Statement: [2010 Myanmar general election, seatsContestedApprox, 1158]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: seatsContestedApprox
Context triple: [2010 Myanmar general election, seatsContestedApprox, 1158]
  • A. numberOfSeatsContested chosen
    Indicates the total count of seats in an election or contest that are being competed for or are up for selection.
  • B. contestsSeatsIn
    Indicates that an individual or party is competing for elected positions within a specified electoral district or governing body.
  • C. numberOfSeatsWon
    Indicates the quantity of seats secured by an entity (such as a party or candidate) in an election or representative body.
  • D. parliamentarySeats
    Indicates the number of seats a party, group, or representative holds in a parliamentary body.
  • E. seatsFreelyContestedInSejm
    Indicates that the specified seats in the Sejm are filled through open, competitive elections without restrictions favoring particular parties or candidates.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83debfc0819095800583e97ab10f completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cca8c93d3c8190b003b2b1af2003b2 completed April 1, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc66003e3c819091e1e42c9cf7c781 completed April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:18 p.m.