Triple

T9116521
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Warm Creek E218731 entity
Predicate hasName P744 FINISHED
Object Warm Creek E218731 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Warm Creek | Statement: [Warm Creek, hasName, Warm Creek]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Warm Creek
Context triple: [Warm Creek, hasName, Warm Creek]
  • A. Warm Creek chosen
    Warm Creek is a watercourse in Southern California that flows through the San Bernardino Valley.
  • B. Sugar Creek
    Sugar Creek is a small city in Jackson County, Missouri, located near Kansas City and known for its historic ties to the oil refinery industry and the Missouri River.
  • C. River Blithe
    River Blithe is a small river in Staffordshire, England, known for flowing through rural landscapes before joining the River Trent.
  • D. Troublesome Creek
    Troublesome Creek is a stream in North Carolina known for flowing through the city of Reidsville and contributing to the local watershed.
  • E. Light River
    Light River is a river in South Australia that flows through agricultural regions before emptying into Gulf St Vincent.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83dc94ac8190b9ef42684d36ff39 completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cca8a4c9e08190ba3603a5d00afb20 completed April 1, 2026, 5:09 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d0307299ec8190acade4f388642e23 completed April 3, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:17 p.m.