Triple
T908605
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 10GBASE-ER |
E19605
|
entity |
| Predicate | powerBudget |
P22593
|
FINISHED |
| Object | higher than 10GBASE-LR |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: higher than 10GBASE-LR | Statement: [10GBASE-ER, powerBudget, higher than 10GBASE-LR]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: powerBudget Context triple: [10GBASE-ER, powerBudget, higher than 10GBASE-LR]
-
A.
powerBudgetCharacteristic
Indicates a relationship where an entity’s power consumption limits, allocations, or constraints are specified as a characteristic or parameter.
-
B.
powerOverMoneyBills
Indicates having control or authority over the handling, allocation, or management of money bills.
-
C.
powerOptimizationFor
Indicates a relationship where one entity is used to improve, manage, or optimize the power consumption or power efficiency of another entity.
-
D.
powerBy
Indicates that one entity operates, functions, or is made possible through the energy, resources, or enabling capabilities provided by another entity.
-
E.
powerDependsOn
Indicates that the power or effectiveness of one entity is contingent upon, or influenced by, another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4939f91a08190ba68c2c81eab90fe |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b3bcad2481908b83575b2fb80d14 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b28ff5948190982c4439eadf9d87 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b3bab5788190a62a0e23a698f7c7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.