Triple
T9077103
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Opatów |
E217515
|
entity |
| Predicate | isCountySeatOf |
P383
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Opatów County |
E142370
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Opatów County | Statement: [Opatów, isCountySeatOf, Opatów County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Opatów County Context triple: [Opatów, isCountySeatOf, Opatów County]
-
A.
Opatów County
chosen
Opatów County is an administrative district in south-central Poland known for its historic town of Opatów and its location within the Świętokrzyskie region.
-
B.
Chęciny County
Chęciny County was a historical administrative district in southern Poland, centered on the town of Chęciny and existing within the former Sandomierz Voivodeship.
-
C.
Kazimierza County
Kazimierza County is an administrative district in south-central Poland known for its rural character and location within the historic Świętokrzyskie region.
-
D.
Stężyca County
Stężyca County was a historical administrative district located within the former Sandomierz Voivodeship in the Kingdom of Poland.
-
E.
Opoczno County
Opoczno County is an administrative district (powiat) in central Poland’s Łódź Voivodeship, known for its mix of small towns, rural areas, and local industry.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83d6c14c8190bc056d927f00a2a2 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc95c6a67c81908d143aa25e1e803e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d017aea1e481909f329ff451ed941c |
completed | April 3, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:12 p.m.