Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: United States v. AT&T | Statement: [MCI v. AT&T, relatedCase, United States v. AT&T]

Target entity: United States v. AT&T
Context triple: [MCI v. AT&T, relatedCase, United States v. AT&T]

• A. United States v. AT&T chosen
  United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
• B. MCI v. AT&T
  MCI v. AT&T was a landmark U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the telecommunications industry that challenged AT&T’s monopoly and helped open the long-distance market to competition.
• C. United States v. Microsoft Corp.
  United States v. Microsoft Corp. was a major U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the late 1990s and early 2000s that challenged Microsoft's dominance in the personal computer operating systems market, particularly its practices related to bundling Internet Explorer with Windows.
• D. United States v. Gementera
  United States v. Gementera is a federal appellate case known for upholding a controversial shaming-based condition of supervised release imposed on a mail thief, raising significant debate about the limits of creative sentencing under the Eighth Amendment.
• E. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
  FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.