Triple
T9029172
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | WorldCom, Inc. |
E216124
|
entity |
| Predicate | facedAllegation |
P83746
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fraudulent accounting practices |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fraudulent accounting practices | Statement: [WorldCom, Inc., facedAllegation, fraudulent accounting practices]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: facedAllegation Context triple: [WorldCom, Inc., facedAllegation, fraudulent accounting practices]
-
A.
hasAllegationsOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is accused or suspected of engaging in certain actions, behaviors, or misconduct, but without implying that these accusations are proven.
-
B.
allegedAction
Indicates that an action is claimed or asserted to have occurred, typically without being proven or confirmed.
-
C.
deniedAllegations
Indicates that one party has rejected or refuted specific accusations made against them.
-
D.
allegedStatus
Indicates that a particular status or condition is claimed or asserted about an entity, but has not been confirmed as true.
-
E.
allegedVictimOf
Indicates that one entity is claimed or reported to have been harmed, wronged, or victimized by another entity, without asserting that the claim is proven.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a5fa88819088144801b4dd7245 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6a9bcb508190b58751f1772407d4 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ee132f08190940749c7c522e4c1 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:08 p.m.