Triple
T9028109
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Apple silicon transition |
E216096
|
entity |
| Predicate | affectsSoftwareCompatibility |
P13559
|
FINISHED |
| Object | macOS applications |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: macOS applications | Statement: [Apple silicon transition, affectsSoftwareCompatibility, macOS applications]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: affectsSoftwareCompatibility Context triple: [Apple silicon transition, affectsSoftwareCompatibility, macOS applications]
-
A.
hasSoftwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one software system can operate correctly and effectively with another software system, without conflicts or required modifications.
-
B.
affectsProgram
chosen
Indicates that one entity produces an influence or change on a program, altering its behavior, state, or outcome.
-
C.
compatibilityNote
Indicates that there is an explanatory note or comment about how well two entities are compatible or work together.
-
D.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
E.
isGenerallyCompatibleWith
Indicates that two entities can typically function or coexist together without significant conflict, issues, or need for special adaptation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a5fa88819088144801b4dd7245 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6a7fcb308190af90d6be8700e498 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ee132f08190940749c7c522e4c1 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:07 p.m.