Triple
T9002819
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Apple Public Source License |
E215075
|
entity |
| Predicate | patentRetaliationClause |
P67196
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Apple Public Source License, patentRetaliationClause, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: patentRetaliationClause Context triple: [Apple Public Source License, patentRetaliationClause, true]
-
A.
patentRetaliation
chosen
Indicates that one party takes or threatens adverse action against another in response to the other’s exercise or enforcement of patent rights.
-
B.
patent
Indicates that a legal protection has been granted to an entity for an invention, giving it exclusive rights to make, use, or sell that invention.
-
C.
patentIn
Indicates that one entity holds or is associated with a patent located, filed, or registered in a particular jurisdiction, organization, or context represented by the other entity.
-
D.
filedPatentCaveatFor
Indicates that one entity has formally submitted a patent caveat or provisional notice of intent to patent on behalf of, or concerning an invention associated with, another entity.
-
E.
usedPatent
Indicates that one entity has made practical or commercial use of a patent owned or associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a12d648190b1e4fe11e8a31890 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6957bd5481908ce74f32f8d197de |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5edd6cb48190b4fc6d6ca0418056 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:05 p.m.