Triple

T9000146
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MiniDisc E215019 entity
Predicate laterCompetedWith P1375 FINISHED
Object solid-state MP3 players LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: solid-state MP3 players | Statement: [MiniDisc, laterCompetedWith, solid-state MP3 players]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterCompetedWith
Context triple: [MiniDisc, laterCompetedWith, solid-state MP3 players]
  • A. competedAs
    Indicates that an entity participated in a competition or contest in the role, category, or capacity specified by another entity.
  • B. competedFor
    Indicates that an entity took part in a contest, rivalry, or competition in pursuit of another entity (such as a prize, position, or resource).
  • C. competesWith chosen
    Indicates that two entities are in rivalry or opposition, each striving to outperform or gain advantage over the other in the same domain or objective.
  • D. tieneCompetenciaEn
    Indicates that an entity possesses skill, expertise, or competence in a specific area, field, or activity.
  • E. hasCompetition
    Indicates that one entity is in a state of rivalry or contest with another entity, typically competing for the same goal, resource, or advantage.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83a12d648190b1e4fe11e8a31890 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc68e3b1f48190bbeafbce363fff53 completed April 1, 2026, 12:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5edd6cb48190b4fc6d6ca0418056 completed March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:05 p.m.