Triple
T8999990
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sony Mobile Communications |
E215016
|
entity |
| Predicate | brand |
P1500
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Xperia |
E41408
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Xperia | Statement: [Sony Mobile Communications, brand, Xperia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Xperia Context triple: [Sony Mobile Communications, brand, Xperia]
-
A.
Xperia
chosen
Xperia is Sony's line of smartphones and tablets known for their sleek design, high-quality displays, and advanced camera technology.
-
B.
Moto X
Moto X is a line of Android smartphones developed by Motorola Mobility, known for its near-stock software experience and emphasis on user customization and voice control features.
-
C.
Moto G
Moto G is a popular line of budget-friendly Android smartphones known for offering strong performance and features at an affordable price.
-
D.
HTC Zoe
HTC Zoe is a camera and gallery feature introduced by HTC that captures short video-like photo sequences and creates dynamic, shareable moments from still images.
-
E.
Nokia X
Nokia X is a line of budget smartphones by Nokia that ran a customized version of Android with a Windows Phone–inspired interface.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a12d648190b1e4fe11e8a31890 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc68e3b1f48190bbeafbce363fff53 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:37 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfdb9741dc8190bec985da8913937c |
completed | April 3, 2026, 3:24 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:05 p.m.