Triple

T8993535
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject UNIX 03 E214845 entity
Predicate governsUseOf P760 FINISHED
Object UNIX trademark for certified systems LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: UNIX trademark for certified systems | Statement: [UNIX 03, governsUseOf, UNIX trademark for certified systems]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governsUseOf
Context triple: [UNIX 03, governsUseOf, UNIX trademark for certified systems]
  • A. regulatesUse
    Indicates that one entity controls, governs, or sets rules for how another entity may be used.
  • B. governs chosen
    Indicates that one entity exercises authoritative control, direction, or rule over another entity or domain.
  • C. governingPolicy
    Indicates that one entity serves as the authoritative policy or set of rules that directs, constrains, or regulates the behavior, operation, or decisions of another entity.
  • D. governedFor
    Indicates that one entity exercised governing authority or administrative control on behalf of, or in the interest of, another entity.
  • E. governedWith
    Indicates that two or more entities share or participate together in the act or process of governing.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83a05c608190bdfdbdb25e994b39 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc687798a881908e6fdd9a39219f1d completed April 1, 2026, 12:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5edba0f88190b97401636a076d7a completed March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:04 p.m.