Triple
T8992721
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Semnani languages |
E214828
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Western Iranian languages |
C7624
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Western Iranian languages Context triple: [Semnani languages, instanceOf, Western Iranian languages]
-
A.
Northwest Iranian language
A Northwest Iranian language is a member of the western branch of the Iranian languages spoken primarily in regions of northwestern Iran and neighboring areas, characterized by shared phonological, lexical, and grammatical features distinct from Southwest Iranian languages.
-
B.
branch of Iranian languages
chosen
A branch of Iranian languages is a subgroup within the Iranian language family comprising closely related languages that share a common historical origin, structural features, and geographic distribution.
-
C.
Elamite language
Elamite language is an extinct language isolate once spoken in the ancient kingdom of Elam in what is now southwestern Iran, known primarily from cuneiform inscriptions dating from the 3rd to 1st millennia BCE.
-
D.
Eastern Romance language
An Eastern Romance language is a member of the Romance branch of the Indo-European language family that evolved from Eastern varieties of Vulgar Latin, primarily spoken in the Balkans and surrounding regions.
-
E.
Middle Persian text
A Middle Persian text is a written work composed in the Middle Iranian language of the Sasanian and early Islamic periods, typically preserved in Pahlavi script or related writing systems.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a05c608190bdfdbdb25e994b39 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:04 p.m.