Triple

T896212
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oort cloud E19351 entity
Predicate observationalStatus P20816 FINISHED
Object inferred but not directly observed as a whole LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inferred but not directly observed as a whole | Statement: [Oort cloud, observationalStatus, inferred but not directly observed as a whole]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: observationalStatus
Context triple: [Oort cloud, observationalStatus, inferred but not directly observed as a whole]
  • A. observerStatusIn
    Indicates that an entity’s status or role is defined or valid within a specified observational context, system, or environment.
  • B. observedBy
    Indicates that an entity is perceived, monitored, or recorded by another entity acting as the observer.
  • C. isObservedOn
    Indicates that a particular phenomenon, condition, or attribute is detected or recorded at a specific time, date, or occasion.
  • D. observationType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of observation being made or recorded in a given context.
  • E. observedAs
    Indicates that one entity is perceived, recorded, or identified in the role, state, or form of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4939d37188190848be3d426ebc9ae completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ad23d6e88190a2fb5e1e168a7b44 completed March 1, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa94f7c881908deeb62308942e19 completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4ab4a38ec8190915916d80299ab55 completed March 1, 2026, 9:10 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.