Triple
T895755
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ombudsman of Portugal |
E19341
|
entity |
| Predicate | complaintsProcedure |
P20807
|
FINISHED |
| Object | free of charge |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: free of charge | Statement: [Ombudsman of Portugal, complaintsProcedure, free of charge]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: complaintsProcedure Context triple: [Ombudsman of Portugal, complaintsProcedure, free of charge]
-
A.
legalProcedureUsed
Indicates that a particular legal procedure or process is applied or employed in relation to a case, action, or legal matter.
-
B.
contactPolicy
Indicates the rules or constraints governing how and when one party is allowed to initiate or maintain contact with another.
-
C.
disputePolicy
Indicates that there is a formal disagreement or conflict regarding a policy, typically triggering procedures for review, negotiation, or resolution.
-
D.
remedySought
Indicates that a particular legal or corrective action is being requested as a solution or relief in response to a problem or dispute.
-
E.
canBeAppealedTo
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4939d37188190848be3d426ebc9ae |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ad23d6e88190a2fb5e1e168a7b44 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa94f7c881908deeb62308942e19 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4ab4a38ec8190915916d80299ab55 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.