Triple
T8952688
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Caesar of the Eastern Roman Empire |
E213392
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSuccessionFunction |
P45981
|
FINISHED |
| Object | orderly imperial succession |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: orderly imperial succession | Statement: [Caesar of the Eastern Roman Empire, hasSuccessionFunction, orderly imperial succession]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSuccessionFunction Context triple: [Caesar of the Eastern Roman Empire, hasSuccessionFunction, orderly imperial succession]
-
A.
hasSuccession
Indicates that one entity follows or replaces another in a sequence, order, or position, forming a succession relationship between them.
-
B.
hasModernSuccessor
Indicates that an entity is followed or replaced by another entity that serves as its modern equivalent or continuation.
-
C.
successorFunction
Indicates the relationship where one entity is defined as the immediate next or following element in a sequence or ordered set relative to another.
-
D.
successorDeterminedBy
chosen
Indicates that the identity of a successor is established or chosen according to a specified rule, process, or determining factor.
-
E.
successorInstanceOf
Indicates that one entity is a later or updated instance of another, preserving a continuity or versioned succession between them.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8399ad2081909f8fa41d4314c215 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc670f88d0819085d7308a5cf6c764 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ed74d288190b712d739805579dc |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:59 p.m.