Triple
T8946057
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nicholas Kaldor |
E213223
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableFor |
P22
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kaldor–Hicks efficiency concept |
E204382
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kaldor–Hicks efficiency concept | Statement: [Nicholas Kaldor, notableFor, Kaldor–Hicks efficiency concept]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kaldor–Hicks efficiency concept Context triple: [Nicholas Kaldor, notableFor, Kaldor–Hicks efficiency concept]
-
A.
Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
chosen
The Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion is an economic efficiency test stating that a policy change is desirable if those who gain could in principle compensate those who lose and still be better off, regardless of whether compensation actually occurs.
-
B.
Pareto efficiency
Pareto efficiency is an economic concept describing an allocation of resources where no individual can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
-
C.
Pareto improvement
A Pareto improvement is a change in allocation that makes at least one individual better off without making anyone else worse off.
-
D.
Coase theorem
The Coase theorem is an economic theory stating that if property rights are well-defined and transaction costs are negligible, private bargaining will lead to an efficient allocation of resources regardless of the initial assignment of rights.
-
E.
Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function
The Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function is a formal tool in welfare economics that aggregates individual utilities into a single measure of social welfare to evaluate and compare economic states or policies.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca839843408190a39069a029a89f15 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc66dd00c481908ff20fd66c1954cc |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:29 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfc1fcb44481908324220aeba1f4e2 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 1:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:59 p.m.