Triple

T8931930
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Montserrado County E212676 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Paynesville E212725 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Paynesville | Statement: [Montserrado County, contains, Paynesville]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Paynesville
Context triple: [Montserrado County, contains, Paynesville]
  • A. Paynesville chosen
    Paynesville is a major city in Liberia, located near the capital Monrovia and known for its role as a key urban and sporting center in the country.
  • B. Yatesville
    Yatesville is a small town located in the U.S. state of Georgia.
  • C. Barberton
    Barberton is a small industrial city in northeastern Ohio known historically for its manufacturing base and proximity to Akron.
  • D. Barberton
    Barberton is a historic mining town in South Africa’s Mpumalanga province, known for its gold rush heritage and proximity to some of the world’s oldest exposed rocks.
  • E. Kanesville
    Kanesville was the mid-19th-century Mormon settlement that later became the city of Council Bluffs, Iowa.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8395c438819087d7cb844ab5990c completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc668e5c108190b08f9cd6b4fd4a8b completed April 1, 2026, 12:27 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cfba64dadc8190aea6f7528acab37a completed April 3, 2026, 1:02 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:57 p.m.