Triple
T892902
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gibraltar pound |
E19279
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalTies |
P16345
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British monetary system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: British monetary system | Statement: [Gibraltar pound, historicalTies, British monetary system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalTies Context triple: [Gibraltar pound, historicalTies, British monetary system]
-
A.
hasHistoricalTieTo
Indicates a relationship where one entity is historically connected or linked to another through past events, associations, or influences.
-
B.
historicallyLinked
chosen
Indicates that two entities are connected through a shared or related historical event, period, or development.
-
C.
historicalRelationship
Indicates a relationship that existed between entities in the past, often tied to a specific historical period, context, or event.
-
D.
historicalMovementAssociatedWith
Indicates that there is an association between an entity and a historical movement, such as a social, political, cultural, or ideological current in history.
-
E.
historicalReference
Indicates that one entity refers to, cites, or alludes to another entity from an earlier time or historical context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4939d37188190848be3d426ebc9ae |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ad0304b081908d4c92bb2beadb81 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa9372e88190b5a9db4afdc045c6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.