Triple

T8924897
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus E212515 entity
Predicate praenomen P7966 FINISHED
Object Gnaeus E222442 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gnaeus | Statement: [Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, praenomen, Gnaeus]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gnaeus
Context triple: [Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, praenomen, Gnaeus]
  • A. Gnaeus chosen
    Gnaeus is the praenomen (given name) of the prominent Roman general and statesman Pompey the Great.
  • B. Gaius
    Gaius was a prominent 2nd-century Roman jurist whose legal writings, especially his Institutes, significantly shaped later Roman and European legal traditions.
  • C. Gaius
    Gaius is an early Christian believer and church member addressed personally and commended by the Apostle John in the New Testament.
  • D. Gaius
    Gaius is the praenomen (personal name) of the Roman lawyer, author, and magistrate known as Pliny the Younger.
  • E. Gaius
    Gaius is a common Roman praenomen (given name) frequently borne by notable figures of the Roman Republic and Empire.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca839481d48190b42b037e0d0f636c completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc66547de881909ea9bfd104b32893 completed April 1, 2026, 12:27 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d1c3f31db48190a63d0d60f108496f completed April 5, 2026, 2:07 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:57 p.m.