Triple
T8921129
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chernobyl Exclusion Zone |
E212416
|
entity |
| Predicate | floraFaunaStatus |
P79076
|
FINISHED |
| Object | significant wildlife presence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: significant wildlife presence | Statement: [Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, floraFaunaStatus, significant wildlife presence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: floraFaunaStatus Context triple: [Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, floraFaunaStatus, significant wildlife presence]
-
A.
wildlifeProtectionStatus
Indicates the level or type of legal or conservation protection currently applied to wildlife.
-
B.
biodiversityStatus
Indicates the current condition or level of biological diversity associated with an entity, often in terms of richness, health, or conservation concern.
-
C.
conservationStatus
Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
-
D.
subjectSpeciesStatus
Indicates the conservation or biological status assigned to the subject species (e.g., endangered, native, invasive, protected).
-
E.
hasWildlifeStatus
chosen
Indicates the conservation or protection status assigned to wildlife associated with an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca839481d48190b42b037e0d0f636c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc665024f081909515e02e5f5b2221 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ed0ef3c81908cc69eac852ee12a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:56 p.m.