Triple
T8918088
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | mintReport |
E212342
|
entity |
| Predicate | canSuggest |
P2811
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fixes for detected problems |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fixes for detected problems | Statement: [mintReport, canSuggest, fixes for detected problems]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canSuggest Context triple: [mintReport, canSuggest, fixes for detected problems]
-
A.
canRecommend
chosen
Indicates that one entity is able or authorized to suggest or endorse another entity as suitable or preferable.
-
B.
canIssueRecommendations
Indicates that an entity has the authority or capability to provide formal recommendations to another entity or about a particular matter.
-
C.
wouldProvide
Indicates that one entity is willing or expected to supply or furnish something to another entity under certain conditions.
-
D.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
-
E.
canRefer
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to mention, point to, or direct attention to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8393b1808190bd4336787ffa2c40 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc66120eb08190913ab6c42f26ffb8 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ed0ef3c81908cc69eac852ee12a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:56 p.m.