Triple
T8917025
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lord of the Gods |
E212317
|
entity |
| Predicate | impliesRelationship |
P1661
|
FINISHED |
| Object | other gods are subordinate |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: other gods are subordinate | Statement: [Lord of the Gods, impliesRelationship, other gods are subordinate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: impliesRelationship Context triple: [Lord of the Gods, impliesRelationship, other gods are subordinate]
-
A.
definesRelationshipBetween
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the nature, type, or rules of a relationship that exists between two or more other entities.
-
B.
implies
chosen
Indicates that the truth of one statement guarantees or leads logically to the truth of another statement.
-
C.
showsRelationshipWith
Indicates that one entity visually or explicitly presents or demonstrates its connection or association with another entity.
-
D.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
E.
semanticRelation
Indicates a general meaning-based connection between two entities, such as similarity, implication, or conceptual association.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8393b1808190bd4336787ffa2c40 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6610cd48819090a184c5f9465626 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ed0ef3c81908cc69eac852ee12a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:56 p.m.