Triple
T8916161
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | mixed constitution (Sparta) |
E212300
|
entity |
| Predicate | ApellaVotingMethod |
P2726
|
FINISHED |
| Object | shouting or acclamation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: shouting or acclamation | Statement: [mixed constitution (Sparta), ApellaVotingMethod, shouting or acclamation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ApellaVotingMethod Context triple: [mixed constitution (Sparta), ApellaVotingMethod, shouting or acclamation]
-
A.
votingMethod
chosen
Indicates the procedure or system by which a vote is cast, collected, and counted in a decision-making or electoral process.
-
B.
electionMethod
Indicates the process or system used to select a candidate or make a decision in an election.
-
C.
voteSplit
Indicates that a voting outcome is divided among multiple options or parties rather than being unanimous or clearly majority.
-
D.
votingControl
Indicates that one entity has the power to determine or significantly influence the outcome of decisions made by another entity through its voting rights.
-
E.
smithPopularVote
Indicates that Smith received a specified number or share of votes in a popular vote election or ballot.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8393b1808190bd4336787ffa2c40 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc660f6a088190b0af829ea809d8ad |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ed0ef3c81908cc69eac852ee12a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:56 p.m.