Triple
T8912999
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | shifting balance theory |
E212228
|
entity |
| Predicate | PhaseIIDescribes |
P50952
|
FINISHED |
| Object | within-deme selection |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: within-deme selection | Statement: [shifting balance theory, PhaseIIDescribes, within-deme selection]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: PhaseIIDescribes Context triple: [shifting balance theory, PhaseIIDescribes, within-deme selection]
-
A.
phaseIIIDescription
Indicates that the entity has a textual description specifically about its Phase III stage in a process, study, or project.
-
B.
phase2Purpose
Indicates the specific intended goal, function, or outcome associated with the second phase of a process or project.
-
C.
phaseInStructure
Indicates that an entity occurs as a particular phase or stage within the structural organization or composition of another entity.
-
D.
secondStageDescription
chosen
Indicates that the predicate provides a textual explanation or details about the second stage of a multi-stage process or sequence.
-
E.
secondPhase
Indicates that an entity is in, or has progressed to, the second phase or stage of a multi-phase process or sequence.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8393b1808190bd4336787ffa2c40 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6525d1408190a76522d7c4ac37da |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ecf55248190a29f00fbf99f13c4 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:56 p.m.