Triple
T891134
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Loving v. Virginia |
E19239
|
entity |
| Predicate | overturnedLaw |
P20756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Virginia statutes prohibiting interracial marriage |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Virginia statutes prohibiting interracial marriage | Statement: [Loving v. Virginia, overturnedLaw, Virginia statutes prohibiting interracial marriage]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: overturnedLaw Context triple: [Loving v. Virginia, overturnedLaw, Virginia statutes prohibiting interracial marriage]
-
A.
overturnedPractice
Indicates that a previously established practice, rule, or precedent has been reversed or invalidated by a later decision or action.
-
B.
wasOverturnedByCourt
Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
-
C.
overturnedInPartBy
Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or outcome has been partially reversed or modified by a later authority or action.
-
D.
wasOverturnedInYear
Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or outcome was reversed or nullified in the specified year.
-
E.
upheldBy
Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4939d37188190848be3d426ebc9ae |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ad019e448190ab991e85dc6d7708 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa9372e88190b5a9db4afdc045c6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4ab4a38ec8190915916d80299ab55 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.