Triple

T8896216
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus E211810 entity
Predicate palimpsestOvertextLanguage P85103 FINISHED
Object Greek LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Greek | Statement: [Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus, palimpsestOvertextLanguage, Greek]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: palimpsestOvertextLanguage
Context triple: [Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus, palimpsestOvertextLanguage, Greek]
  • A. palimpsest
    Indicates that something has been reused or overwritten while still retaining traces or remnants of its earlier form or content.
  • B. laterEditionParatext
    Indicates that the paratext is taken from or associated with a later edition of the work than the primary text or base edition under consideration.
  • C. languageOfWritings
    Indicates that a specified language is the one in which certain writings or written works are composed.
  • D. inscriptionsLanguage
    Indicates that the language used in the inscriptions on an object or surface is the specified language.
  • E. secondaryLanguageOfInscriptions
    Indicates that a specified language serves as the secondary language used in the inscriptions associated with a given entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83918d3081909b326fa3750cb8c8 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc61bfec0881908e4ef5b7f0e6b542 completed April 1, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5c2bfb38819083d5eb1af8ccf4d6 completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc5cffe8ec819084c12770fe0578f2 completed March 31, 2026, 11:47 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:54 p.m.