Triple
T8892888
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | That's My Kick |
E211722
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasImprovisationStyle |
P85584
|
FINISHED |
| Object | inventive |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inventive | Statement: [That's My Kick, hasImprovisationStyle, inventive]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasImprovisationStyle Context triple: [That's My Kick, hasImprovisationStyle, inventive]
-
A.
hasImprovisation
Indicates that an entity includes, involves, or is characterized by improvisational elements or unscripted creative actions in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
hasImprovisedSoloBy
Indicates that an improvised solo performance is attributed to or performed by a specific entity.
-
C.
hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic
Indicates that something possesses or exhibits a particular musical style as a defining characteristic.
-
D.
hasSongStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses, is characterized by, or is associated with a particular style or genre of song.
-
E.
hasOffbeatStyle
Indicates that an entity exhibits an unconventional, quirky, or nontraditional style or manner.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83907954819096d52a245b635841 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc61bb46c881909e579bb1926e5204 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c2aec04819093c932fe51c0f08d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cc5d6e54808190af4156edd4c8ffbc |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:54 p.m.